Lawyers

“As Is” Does Not Mean “License to Lie”: The Johnson v. Davis Duty to Disclose

“As Is” Does Not Mean “License to Lie”: The Johnson v. Davis Duty to Disclose

Home inspector looks for deeper damage beneath a cosmetic siding issue

Buying a home “As Is” in Florida does not mean the seller had permission to stay silent about known problems. The Johnson v. Davis duty to disclose requires sellers to reveal material defects they knew about before closing, regardless of “As Is” language in the contract.

Many buyers assume “As Is” leaves them with no options after discovering hidden damage. That assumption is incorrect under Florida law, and understanding why may change how a buyer evaluates the situation.

SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION

Key Takeaways for Johnson v. Davis Duty to Disclose

  • The Florida Supreme Court’s Johnson v. Davis decision replaced the old “buyer beware” rule with an affirmative duty for sellers to disclose known material defects that affect property value
  • An “As Is” clause limits a buyer’s right to request repairs for unknown issues, but it does not protect a seller who concealed or failed to disclose defects they knew about
  • Buyers who discover hidden defects after closing may pursue a claim if evidence shows the seller had knowledge of the problem before the sale

What Did Johnson v. Davis Change in Florida Real Estate Law?

The Johnson v. Davis (1985) decision eliminated the old caveat emptor rule for residential real estate in Florida. Caveat emptor means “buyer beware,” and under that standard, sellers had little obligation to volunteer information about property problems.

The Florida Supreme Court rejected that approach. The court held that sellers must disclose material facts known to them that are not readily observable and that affect the property’s value. In everyday terms, if a seller knows about a serious hidden problem, staying quiet is not a legal option. This ruling applies to every residential sale in Florida today, whether the contract says “As Is” or not.

Does “As Is” Eliminate a Seller’s Disclosure Duty in Florida?

No. An “As Is” clause does not override a seller’s duty to disclose known defects. The clause means the buyer agrees to accept the property’s current condition for issues neither party knew about. It does not shield sellers who hide problems.

This is one of the most important caveat emptor exceptions in Florida real estate. Many buyers believe signing an “As Is” contract means they gave up all rights. That is not accurate when the seller had knowledge of a defect and failed to disclose it.

Can You Sue a Seller for Non-Disclosure in Florida If the Property Was Sold “As Is”?

Yes. Under the Johnson v. Davis duty to disclose, Florida sellers must reveal known material defects even in “As Is” transactions. An “As Is” clause covers unknown issues, not defects the seller knew about and hid. Buyers who discover concealed problems like mold, water damage, or structural failures after closing may have legal grounds to pursue a claim.

How Do “As Is” and Disclosure Obligations Differ in Florida?

Scenario Seller Knowledge Disclosure Required? Legal Risk to Seller
Defect unknown to both parties No No Low
Defect known to seller, not disclosed Yes Yes High
Defect actively concealed by seller Yes Yes High
Visible defect buyer could observe Yes No (readily observable) Low
   

What Counts as a Material Fact Affecting Value in Florida Real Estate?

   

A material fact affecting value in Florida real estate is any condition a reasonable buyer would consider important when deciding whether to purchase the property or how much to pay.

  • Water intrusion or flooding history
  • Mold contamination hidden in walls, attics, or HVAC systems
  • Structural damage to foundations, walls, or roof framing
  • Major plumbing or electrical defects
  • Pest damage, including undisclosed termite issues

SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION

When Does Non-Disclosure Become Fraudulent Concealment in Real Estate?

Fraudulent concealment occurs when a seller knowingly hides a material defect or takes steps to prevent the buyer from discovering it. Active concealment, such as painting over water stains or covering damage before listing the property, may strengthen a claim.

What Evidence Supports a Claim for Suing a Seller for Non-Disclosure in Florida?

  • Prior inspection reports
  • Repair invoices or contractor estimates
  • Insurance claims for the property
  • County permit records
  • Communications acknowledging the defect

What Steps May Buyers Take After Discovering Hidden Defects in Florida?

  • Hire a licensed inspector to document the defect
  • Photograph the damage before repairs begin
  • Pull permit and insurance records
  • Preserve closing documents and disclosures

Florida Seller Disclosure Questions Answered by a Plantation Attorney

No. An “As Is” clause does not eliminate disclosure requirements. Sellers must still disclose known material defects under Johnson v. Davis.

A latent defect is a hidden property problem that is not readily observable during a normal inspection or walkthrough.

Inspection reports, repair records, insurance claims, permit records, and written communications may help establish seller knowledge.

When Does a Non-Disclosure Dispute Need an Attorney?

Man reviews multiple, collated stacks of documents

A non-disclosure dispute may warrant attorney review when evidence suggests the seller knew about a hidden defect before closing and failed to disclose it.

Attorney Carlos M. Amor holds dual licensure as both a Florida attorney and real estate broker, with more than fifteen years of Florida real estate law experience. The Law Office of Carlos M. Amor, P.A. offers free consultations by phone, video, or in person. Call (954) 453-7200 or contact the firm online to discuss your situation. Serving Plantation and all of South Florida.

SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION

The Help You Need

Request your FREE consultation and get the help you need to move forward.

    1385 South Colorado Blvd. Suite A-720
    Denver, CO 80222

    divider

    Archives