Buying a home “As Is” in Florida does not mean the seller had permission to stay silent about known problems. The Johnson v. Davis duty to disclose requires sellers to reveal material defects they knew about before closing, regardless of “As Is” language in the contract.
Many buyers assume “As Is” leaves them with no options after discovering hidden damage. That assumption is incorrect under Florida law, and understanding why may change how a buyer evaluates the situation.
Key Takeaways for Johnson v. Davis Duty to Disclose
- The Florida Supreme Court’s Johnson v. Davis decision replaced the old “buyer beware” rule with an affirmative duty for sellers to disclose known material defects that affect property value
- An “As Is” clause limits a buyer’s right to request repairs for unknown issues, but it does not protect a seller who concealed or failed to disclose defects they knew about
- Buyers who discover hidden defects after closing may pursue a claim if evidence shows the seller had knowledge of the problem before the sale
The Johnson v. Davis (1985) decision eliminated the old caveat emptor rule for residential real estate in Florida. Caveat emptor means “buyer beware,” and under that standard, sellers had little obligation to volunteer information about property problems.
The Florida Supreme Court rejected that approach. The court held that sellers must disclose material facts known to them that are not readily observable and that affect the property’s value. In everyday terms, if a seller knows about a serious hidden problem, staying quiet is not a legal option. This ruling applies to every residential sale in Florida today, whether the contract says “As Is” or not.
No. An “As Is” clause does not override a seller’s duty to disclose known defects. The clause means the buyer agrees to accept the property’s current condition for issues neither party knew about. It does not shield sellers who hide problems.
This is one of the most important caveat emptor exceptions in Florida real estate. Many buyers believe signing an “As Is” contract means they gave up all rights. That is not accurate when the seller had knowledge of a defect and failed to disclose it.
Can You Sue a Seller for Non-Disclosure in Florida If the Property Was Sold “As Is”?
Yes. Under the Johnson v. Davis duty to disclose, Florida sellers must reveal known material defects even in “As Is” transactions. An “As Is” clause covers unknown issues, not defects the seller knew about and hid. Buyers who discover concealed problems like mold, water damage, or structural failures after closing may have legal grounds to pursue a claim.
| Scenario | Seller Knowledge | Disclosure Required? | Legal Risk to Seller |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defect unknown to both parties | No | No | Low |
| Defect known to seller, not disclosed | Yes | Yes | High |
| Defect actively concealed by seller | Yes | Yes | High |
| Visible defect buyer could observe | Yes | No (readily observable) | Low |
A material fact affecting value in Florida real estate is any condition a reasonable buyer would consider important when deciding whether to purchase the property or how much to pay.
Fraudulent concealment occurs when a seller knowingly hides a material defect or takes steps to prevent the buyer from discovering it. Active concealment, such as painting over water stains or covering damage before listing the property, may strengthen a claim.
A non-disclosure dispute may warrant attorney review when evidence suggests the seller knew about a hidden defect before closing and failed to disclose it.
Attorney Carlos M. Amor holds dual licensure as both a Florida attorney and real estate broker, with more than fifteen years of Florida real estate law experience. The Law Office of Carlos M. Amor, P.A. offers free consultations by phone, video, or in person. Call (954) 453-7200 or contact the firm online to discuss your situation. Serving Plantation and all of South Florida.